Hi all,
I'm working on the analyzer for the slovanic latin languages
(cs,sk) w/o stemming at first.
I would like to ask you:
The StopWord analyzer uses often HashSet implementation, but the the
Stopwords are not changed often (if ever) from shipped in the java
code. Do you think that is there benefit for the perfect hash
algorithm?
My guess is that you wouldn't save much time here using a perfect hash.
I will do an ICU analyzer for latin chars (decompositing and return
base char). Have you any exp. with icu(.sf.net) some problems,
bottlenecks?
This could be a significant performance hit. Using ICU is a good
idea, but typically putting some simple front-end filtering in front
can save you a lot of time.
E.g. if there are a lot of characters that don't require any
decomposition, you could do some quick (and very conservative) checks
to skip calls to ICU.
But of course, measure then optimize :)
P. S.: also I would like these stuff contribute to lucene-contrib if
it'll be recognized useful. Is there any howto set the Eclipse for
Lucene/Apache related project?
If you're asking about how to set up Eclipse to do development for
Lucene, I found some posts to the mailing list a while back, but
nothing definitive.
FWIW, my experience w/Eclipse 3.1 was that trying to auto-create
Eclipse projects using the Ant build file didn't work very well. So
we wound up manually creating the project, setting up the classpath,
etc.
-- Ken
--
Ken Krugler
Krugle, Inc.
+1 530-470-9200
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
