I've been away from constant e-mail for several days (nice while it
lasted, but rough to come back to!)...
I'm +1 for 1.9 RC1, just for the record. As for the copyright years
- those should reflect only the years those files were touched, at
least that is how it is carefully done with Ant and now Tapestry.
Erik
On Feb 14, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
I'm not sure what the ASF/Lucene policy is on keeping Copyright/
License
statements in source files up to date, but should they all be
updated to
say "Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation" prior to a 1.9
release?
It shouldn't hurt!
This week is pretty booked for me, so, barring major objections, I
will make a 1.9 RC1 release next Monday, February 20th. If there
are no problems discovered, I'll aim to make a 1.9 final release a
week later, around the 27th.
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
