Didn't get to it today, and likely won't have time tomorrow. I'll look for a new patch or do it next week.
Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:21:31 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-500) Lucene 2.0 requirements - Remove all deprecated code I can this weekend, otherwise if you want to go ahead that is fine. I think there are only two or three places that use DateField, plus the file itself. Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA) wrote: > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-500?page=comments#action_12370765 > ] > > Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-500: > ----------------------------------------- > > Grant, it looks like we have a good plan for going forward. > Can you/do you want to submit a new patch, or should I try to modify the > original one? > > > >> Lucene 2.0 requirements - Remove all deprecated code >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: LUCENE-500 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-500 >> Project: Lucene - Java >> Type: Task >> Versions: 1.9 >> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll >> Attachments: deprecation.txt >> >> Per the move to Lucene 2.0 from 1.9, remove all deprecated code and update >> documentation, etc. >> Patch to follow shortly. >> > > -- Grant Ingersoll Sr. Software Engineer Center for Natural Language Processing Syracuse University School of Information Studies 335 Hinds Hall Syracuse, NY 13244 http://www.cnlp.org Voice: 315-443-5484 Fax: 315-443-6886 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
