I recently submitted a patch that replaces the implementation for multi-term queries (used for fuzzy and wildcard queries) with an implementation that does the union through a priority queue (these are always disjunctions). You *COULD* mimic this change to replace the mechanism used for range queries. If you are dealing with a very large number of range elements then performance can still be quite bad but at least it doesn't throw.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524 Randy -----Original Message----- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 5:48 PM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [newbie]problem about range query There is a FAQ thta covers it, I just updated it since it was somewhat out of date and lacked some of the newest (bestest?) info about dealing with this problem... http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb 3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831 In the future, questions about using lucene and exceptions you may get are ment for the java-user mailing list. java-dev is for discussing changes to the lucene code base itself. : I used following code to do my range searching: : but i met follow error messages: : : Exception in thread "main" : org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
