InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index
-----------------------------------------------------

         Key: LUCENE-550
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550
     Project: Lucene - Java
        Type: New Feature

  Components: Store  
    Versions: 1.9    
    Reporter: Karl Wettin


After fixing the bugs, it's now 4.5 -> 5 times the speed. This is true for both 
at index and query time. Sorry if I got your hopes up too much. There are still 
things to be done though. Might not have time to do anything with this until 
next month, so here is the code if anyone wants a peek.

Not good enough for Jira yet, but if someone wants to fool around with it, here 
it is. The implementation passes a TermEnum -> TermDocs -> Fields -> TermVector 
comparation against the same data in a Directory.

When it comes to features, offsets don't exists and positions are stored ugly 
and has bugs.

You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who 
refactored it to see if it would do any good. Bit shifting don't take many 
ticks, so I might just revert that.

I belive the code is quite self explaining.

InstanciatedIndex ii = ..
ii.new InstanciatedIndexReader();
ii.addDocument(s).. replace IndexWriter for now.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to