I don't like how fields are configured.
Document doc = new Document();
Field f;
f = new Field("foo", "bar tzar", Field.Store.NO,
Field.Index.TOKENIZED, Field.TermVector.YES);
f.setBoost(1.5f);
doc.add(f);
f = new Field("foo", "blah yada", Field.Store.NO,
Field.Index.TOKENIZED, Field.TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS);
f.setBoost(2f);
doc.add(f);
This could lead me to believe I can use different boost for fields
with the same name within one document. I guess it is nice that I can
set it up so that different subsets of the terms are stored a
specific way in the term vector, even though I never had to use it.
But the boosts are stored by field name, right? There are no
constraints in the code. I would at least expect a warning when
indexing above document.
How about refactoring fields to something like:
[Document](fieldName)<#>---- {0..1} ->[Field +boost]<#>---- {0..*} ->
[FieldValue +store +index +termVector]
instead of as now:
[Document](fieldName)<#>---- {0..1} ->[Field +boost +store +index
+termVector]
I would not mind if it worked the way the design implies, but it
doesn't. Right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
