Duh, sorry for the noise.  I didn't see that attachment in the other message.  
It looks like it wasn't stripped after all.

Otis

----- Original Message ----
From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2006 11:08:42 AM
Subject: Re: 2.0 release

Murat,

The mailing list software strips attachments.  You may want to post this 
somewhere and send the URL.

Thanks,
Otis

----- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2006 9:27:34 AM
Subject: Re: 2.0 release


Previously, I replied to another thread on Vectors.
The attached .xsl file which shows avg. msec. for changing buffer sizes,
reported from an experiment on TREC collection.

This might help for a decision.

Cheers,
Murat

> I recall somebody (Doug, I think, but I could be wrong) trying different
> buffer sizes and reporting insignificant performance changes.  But please
> provide a patch in the JIRA issue, and people can vote for it, if they
> like it.
>
> Otis
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Tatu Saloranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; Maxim Patramanskij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2006 7:11:42 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.0 release
>
> --- Maxim Patramanskij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Currently,  buffer sizes for BufferedIndexInput and
>> BufferedIndexOutput are equals and have constant
>> size of 1024 bytes.
>>
>> When using a database for index persistence, it
>> slowdowns performance much
>> because of relatively small buffer size. With
>> JDBCDirectory and buffer
>> size increased from 1Kb to 16Kb I got 200%(3 times)
>> performance
>> increase for indexing.
>>
>> What about adding a possibility to change buffer
>> size on runtime, that
>> client code can set appropriate values depending on
>> what persistence
>> type for indexing is used?
>
> Adding configurability is good, and also changing the
> default value to be bit more optimal would be even
> better? Just changing default to 2k or 4k (4k is close
> to a physical page size, might be good default?) might
> be worth doing as well.
> I mean, 90% of users probably use things exactly as
> they are configured by default; so this would probably
> make many Lucene users happy. ;-)
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to