[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12379128 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: ------------------------------------ Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-550: > This looks very promising. Unfortunately the code you provide makes many > incompatible API > changes (e.g., turning Term into an interface that has far fewer methods) > removes lots of > useful javadoc, etc. So please don't expect it to be committed soon! I agree, there is lots of work to be done on it. It was eaiser for me to think clear when everything was seperated. Basically there are only a few changes to the API that is needed: 1. Document nor Term may be final. 2. Something other minor that I forgot about. It can all be fixed, but is nothing that I prioritize right now. If you feel it would be a nice thing for 2.0, tolk me what changes you are OK with and gave me at least two weeks notice I /might/ find time to back-factor the code. > InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-550 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550 > Project: Lucene - Java > Type: New Feature > Components: Store > Versions: 1.9 > Reporter: Karl Wettin > Attachments: Document.java, InstanciatedIndex.java, Term.java, > class_diagram.png, class_diagram.png, src-1.9karl1_20060611.tar.gz, > src.tar.gz, src_20060509.tar.gz > > After fixing the bugs, it's now 4.5 -> 5 times the speed. This is true for > both at index and query time. Sorry if I got your hopes up too much. There > are still things to be done though. Might not have time to do anything with > this until next month, so here is the code if anyone wants a peek. > Not good enough for Jira yet, but if someone wants to fool around with it, > here it is. The implementation passes a TermEnum -> TermDocs -> Fields -> > TermVector comparation against the same data in a Directory. > When it comes to features, offsets don't exists and positions are stored ugly > and has bugs. > You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who > refactored it to see if it would do any good. Bit shifting don't take many > ticks, so I might just revert that. > I belive the code is quite self explaining. > InstanciatedIndex ii = .. > ii.new InstanciatedIndexReader(); > ii.addDocument(s).. replace IndexWriter for now. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
