[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-557?page=all ]
Hoss Man reassigned LUCENE-557:
-------------------------------
Assign To: Hoss Man
Status Update:
The patches so far fix all of the known issues that don't involve a Scorer
"matching" a document with a score of 0.0 ... the SpanScorer patch isn't pretty
... but it may be considered acceptable depending on the scope of LUCENE-569.
If LUCENE-569 does get fixed, no changes to SpanScorer for explain should be
needed.
Recent mailing list discussion on the merits of changing the Explanation API to
deal with the remaining cases...
http://www.nabble.com/BooleanWeight.normalize%28float%29-doesn%27t-normalize-prohibited-clauses--t1596471.html#a4347644
I'm going to let all of this sit for a bit and revisit it later.
> search vs explain - score discrepancies
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-557
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-557
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Type: Bug
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Attachments: LUCENE-557-BooleanQuery-explain-fix.patch,
> LUCENE-557-FilteredQuery-explain-fix.patch,
> LUCENE-557-SpanScorer-explain-HACK-fix.patch,
> LUCENE-557-modify-existing-tests.patch,
> LUCENE-557-modify-existing-tests.patch, LUCENE-557-newtests.zip,
> LUCENE-557-newtests.zip
>
> I'm on a mission to demonstrate (and then hopefully fix) any inconsistencies
> between the score you get for a doc when executing a search, and the score
> you get when asking for an explanation of the query for that doc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
