On May 12, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
I finally got around to making the NioFSDirectory with caching 1.9 compliant. I also produced a performance test case.
How does this implementation compare to the MMapDirectory?I've found that the MMapDirectory is far faster than the FSDirectory on 64-bit machines with very large indexes. Is the explicit caching of the NioFSDirectory expected to be a considerable win over allowing the OS to do caching of data from the filesystem?
-pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
