On Wednesday 17 May 2006 06:35, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > There does not seem to be a lot of demand for one implementation of > Lucene to read indexes generated by another implementation of Lucene > for the purposes of indexing or searching. However, there is a > demand for index browsing via Luke. > > It occurred to me today that if Luke were powered by a version of > Lucene with my bytecount-based-strings patch applied, it would be > able to read indexes generated by Ferret. Ironically, it wouldn't be > able to read KinoSearch indexes unless I reverted the change which > causes the term vectors to be stored in the .fdt file. I'd probably > do that. Luke is great.
> > One possibility for distributing such a beast is to offer a patched > jar for download from my website. Before I start down that road, > though, I thought I'd bring up the subject here. > > Thoughts? Try and invoke luke with the a lucene jar of your choice on the classpath before luke itself: java -cp lucene-core-1.9-rc1-dev.jar:lukeall.jar org.getopt.luke.Luke Regards, Paul Elschot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
