I think it would be hard as there are many places in Lucene where it is assumed that doc-ids uniquely identify a document. This is the main reason that ParallelReader has these constraints.
Are you sure the transactionalizing updates to sub-indexes will cause you performance problems? My application is also time-sensitive and this doesn't seem to be a big problem, at least at the moment. You might try it first and see whether or not the performance is acceptable. Chuck wu fox wrote on 05/21/2006 05:17 PM: > Some of the indices are time-sensitive,so a transaction may not suit > for me. Can some method meet the time requirement besides the > constraints of parallelReader?Thank you again > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
