Is there a chance that LUCENE-485 makes it into 2.0? There's a patch attached and Doug added a +1 in the comments...
It reduces the time IndexWriter keeps the commit lock while cleaning up obsolete files/segments. The commit lock should be held while the 'working set' is changing, but is not necessary during cleanup. Thanks, Luc -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 19 mei 2006 1:23 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene 2.0 I think Lucene-561 is in the "egregious" category and it has a patch to fix it (be sure to get the most recent of the two). Can this be included? Chuck Yonik Seeley wrote on 05/18/2006 10:50 AM: > On 5/18/06, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > at the monent, there are two Jira issues with a "Fix" version of >> 2.0 still >> > unresolved: LUCENE-556 and LUCENE-546 > > I wouldn't seeing 415 being fixed, but I seem to be missing a way one > changes "Fix Version". > > -Yonik > http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search > server > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
