On 5/27/06, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Samstag 27 Mai 2006 18:11, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I understand legacy situations, but surely anyone doing a major Lucene
> upgrade can upgrade the JVM at the same time (the performance boosts
> alone are worth it.)
You can get the improved performance by running 1.4 code with the 1.5 JVM,
right? So that shouldn't be a reason to require 1.5.
My point was that most people doing a major upgrade of Lucene would
also want to upgrade the JVM just for the performance boosts. Hence
boosting the Lucene requirement to Java1.5 shouldn't be a burden for
most people.
However I don't think Lucene 2.0 is the right place for requiring
Java5, since it's already released and has no Java1.5 requirement. If
we changed now, we would be requiring a JVM upgrade for patch releases
(not good).
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
