So I guess that would be totally alright to build the gdata server 1.5
dependent.
does anyone feel comfortable with that?
simon
On 5/29/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To weigh in with my take, all environments I develop and deploy to
are at JDK/JRE 1.5. Solr is exclusively for 1.5+ and it has top
billing my architecture. GData server at 1.5 is perfectly fine by
me. I'd use it, and very interested in Solr collaboration as well.
Erik
On May 29, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> I guess this discussion isn't over...
> I would like to know if anybody would feel uncomfortable with a 1.5
> dependend contrib project like the GData Server?
>
> I'm not sure whether it is worth to think about a 2.0 / 2.1 (tiger)
> branch. That would be a lot more work but far less fight ;)
>
> simon
>
> On 5/29/06, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Boy, I'd sure like to see at least one bug-fix release for 2.0
>> maintain java 1.4 compatibility. Would that be 2.1?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> > This sounds reasonable to me. I feel bad about Andi and
>> PyLucene, but it sounds like GCJ(X) will soon be up-to-date (the
>> link Andi sent was from early February). Discussion done or?
>> >
>> > Otis
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> > From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 7:12:15 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5
>> >
>> > : important new facilities. Repeating my earlier question, why
>> should a
>> > : platform that is 2 years behind for java expect to be at the
>> latest and
>> > : greatest level for lucene? I'd propose 2.0 (+ branched
>> patches) be the
>> > : 1.4 release distribution, with 2.1 free to move up to 1.5.
>> >
>> > I would ammend that proposal slightly...
>> >
>> > 1a) Lucene Core 2.0.* releases garuntee java1.4 compatibility
>> > 1b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.0.* releases are free to require
>> any java
>> > version they choose.
>> >
>> > 2a) Lucene Core 2.1.* release garuntee java1.5 compatibility.
>> > 2b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.1.* releases are free to require
>> any java
>> > version they choose.
>> >
>> > -Hoss
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
