: > > Should This HACK be commited, or is it better to leave explanations for : > > SpanNear queries broken untill someone has the confidence to fix LUCENE-569?
: > I think it would be all right as long as you make a note of it on the : > 569 issue and in the code so that people know why the change is in there. : I'll try and make the change to NearSpansOrdered indicated here: : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-569#action_12411904 : in a week or so to avoid the need for hacks and comments to jira issues : in the code. yeah ... I think i'll move forward with commiting just the CheckHits additions, the BooleanQuery and FilteredQuery fixes, as well as all of the new test cases that pass. I'll attach the explain test patches that rely on NearSpans.skipTo to LUCENE-569, and all of the remaining new tests that require a "match" boolean to LUCENE-605 -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
