On Jul 11, 2006, at 3:51 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Andi Vajda wrote:
I'd be interested in doing this but what is it that we're after in
'supporting gcj' actually ?
I think it would sufficient to:
1. Compile only .jar and .class with gcj (not .java).
2. Pass all unit tests on a single platform.
This would provide an existence proof that Lucene can run under
GCJ, and doesn't require solving GCJ's porting issues.
For me the platform of choice would be MacOS X, since 10.3 will never
have Java 5. (IIRC, 10.4 has only been out for about a year.)
Most of the other platforms will.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
