On 9/22/06, Andi Vajda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A PyLucene user just submitted a patch to PyLucene to integrate Solr's
PrefixFilter class. PyLucene is not PySolr but it looks like PrefixFilter has
nothing specific to Solr in it and PrefixFilter could be useful to regular
Lucene users as well.
Are there any objections to checking org.apache.solr.search.PrefixFilter into
Lucene's search package ? I could submit a patch, but codewise, it's trivial
enough to just rename the package it's in to org.apache.lucene.search.
What do you think ?
In PrefixFilter, I was experimenting with decoupling id generation
from id collection.
I'm not sure if I liked the result, but I never got around to taking
another shot at it.
Another idea might be to have a TermEnumFilter that is defined to be
all the documents matched by a TermEnum. Then we could also define
RangeTermEnum and PrefixTermEnum.
Anyway, the id-generation implementation is hidden (package
protected), so I guess it should be fine to put it in Lucene.
Any objections?
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
