[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-627?page=comments#action_12438553 ] 
            
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-627:
-------------------------------------

I agree with Kerang about the expected behavior (of this specific case at 
least).
The test case of mine quoted above was not what I was shooting for, but was an 
acceptable unintended side-effect of fixing the other cases.

So I'm fine with this case being changed to
    query = new QueryParser("text",new WhitespaceAnalyzer()).parse("hi speed");
    highlighter = new Highlighter(new QueryScorer(query));
    result = highlighter.getBestFragments(getTS2(), s, 3, "...");
    assertEquals("<B>Hi</B>-<B>Speed</B>10 foo",result);

> highlighter problems with overlapping tokens
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-627
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-627
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Other
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 2.0.1
>
>         Attachments: highlight_overlap.diff, Highlighter.java.diff
>
>
> The lucene highlighter has problems when tokens that overlap are generated.
> For example, if analysis of iPod generates the tokens "i", "pod", "ipod" 
> (with pod and ipod in the same position),
> then the highlighter will output this as iipod, regardless of if any of those 
> tokens are highlighted.
> Discovered via http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-24

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to