[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-509?page=comments#action_12442154 ] 
            
Steven Tamm commented on LUCENE-509:
------------------------------------


   [[ Old comment, sent by email on Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:16:17 -0700 ]]

It does.  There isn't a real performance difference between
LOAD_AND_BREAK and my getField thing, except it'll create two extra
objects (Vector & Document).  Probably not that big a deal since the
bigger issue was the IO in reading the rest of the document.

Close mine out.

-Steven



> Performance optimization when retrieving a single field from a document
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-509
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-509
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Steven Tamm
>         Assigned To: Otis Gospodnetic
>         Attachments: DocField.patch, DocField_2.patch, DocField_3.patch, 
> DocField_4.patch, DocField_4b.patch
>
>
> If you just want to retrieve a single field from a Document, the only way to 
> do it is to retrieve all the fields from the Document and then search it.  
> This patch is an optimization that allows you retrieve a specific field from 
> a document without instantiating a lot of field and string objects.  This 
> reduces our memory consumption on a per query basis by around around 20% when 
> a lot of documents are returned.
> I've added a lot of comments saying you should only call it if you only ever 
> need one field.  There's also a unit test.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to