: That's the convention we've used in Lucene projects. The idea is that : users should have to go out of their way to build something named : lucene-2.0.0.jar, since they're likely to patch things. Only the : official builds should look like official builds, everything else should : look like a developer build of some version subsequent to the release build. : : Yes, this confuses a lot of folks and probably deserves an FAQ.
we have one, but it could probably be expanded/reworded... http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-42361d89c6ea75536ba2780543c60e1fd9c9b682 When I compile Lucene 1.4.x the file I get is called lucene-1.5-rc1-dev.jar, what's up? That's not a bug, the name is supposed to make clear that you built your own version, possibly with local modifications. Feel free to rename the file. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
