[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-657?page=all ]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-657:
---------------------------------
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: Steven Parkes
Anybody worried about this? Seems like a very nominal change. Any reason we
would want to inhibit people from extended a query class like FuzzyQuery?
> FuzzyQuery should not be final
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-657
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-657
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Environment: all platforms
> Reporter: Andreas Neumann
> Assigned To: Steven Parkes
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.1
>
> Attachments: fuzzy.patch
>
>
> I am trying to extend the FuzzyQuery to further filter the TermEnum. (I am
> indexing stem forms and original forms, but I only want to match original
> forms with a fuzzy term, otherwise I get to much noise). However, FuzzyQuery
> is a final class and I cannot extend it.
> As discussed in the mailing list
> (http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/38756), we want to
> make the private variables and inner classes protected.
> I am attaching a patch for FuzzyQuery.java that implements this. I ran all
> unit tests and they passed without errors.
> Andreas.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
