Follow up on the workflow stuff: With a larger group of people able to work at the Jira level, do we want to have an approach to assignee? Otis was getting ready to commit a patch I had shepherded through and assigned the issue to himself in the process. This is what's always been done in the past, but in the past committers and developers/contributors were pretty much synonymous.
Since that's not the case now, I'd suggest it's reasonable for a committer to commit w/o changing the assignee, only changing the state to resolved. Facilitates communication on issues that might arise later and helps gauge individual involvement. I suppose there's the possibility that two committers might be looking at committing something at the same time, though I think comments cover that? Seem reasonable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
