[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-669?page=all ]

Otis Gospodnetic updated LUCENE-669:
------------------------------------

    Lucene Fields: [Patch Available]

Looks fine to me.

Maybe change this a bit:
   public void close() throws IOException {
-    if (!isClone)
-      file.close();
+    if (!isClone) {
+      if (file != null) {
+        file.close();
+        file = null;
+      }
+    }
   }

That if (file != null) block could be replaced with closeFile() call, I think.

Also, what was closing the file when you run this in Eclipse?

> finalize()-methods of FSDirectory.FSIndexInput and FSDirectory.FSIndexOutput 
> try to close already closed file
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-669
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-669
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: FSDirectory_close_file_patch.patch
>
>
> Hi all,
> I found a small problem in FSDirectory: The finalize()-methods of 
> FSDirectory.FSIndexInput and FSDirectory.FSIndexOutput try to close the 
> underlying file. This is not a problem unless the file has been closed before 
> by calling the close() method. If it has been closed before, the finalize 
> method throws an IOException saying that the file is already closed. Usually 
> this IOException would go unnoticed, because the GarbageCollector, which 
> calls finalize(), just eats it. However, if I use the Eclipse debugger the 
> execution of my code will always be suspended when this exception is thrown.
> Even though this exception probably won't cause problems during normal 
> execution of Lucene, the code becomes cleaner if we apply this small patch. 
> Might this IOException also have a performance impact, if it is thrown very 
> frequently?
> I attached the patch which applies cleanly on the current svn HEAD. All 
> testcases pass and I verfied with the Eclipse debugger that the IOException 
> is not longer thrown.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to