[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-709?page=comments#action_12448923 ] Chuck Williams commented on LUCENE-709: ---------------------------------------
Mea Culpa! Bad bug on my part. Thanks for spotting it! I believe the solution is simple. RAMDirectory.files is a Hashtable, i.e. it is synchronized. Hashtable.values() tracks all changes to the ram directory as they occur. The fail-fast iterator does not accept concurrent modificaitons. So, the answer is to stop concurrent modifications during sizeInBytes(). This is accomplised by synchronizing on the same objects as the modificaitons already use, i.e. files. I'm attaching a new version of the the patch that I believe is correct. Please emabarass me again if there is another mistake! > [PATCH] Enable application-level management of IndexWriter.ramDirectory size > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-709 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-709 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Environment: All > Reporter: Chuck Williams > Attachments: ramDirSizeManagement.patch, ramDirSizeManagement.patch > > > IndexWriter currently only supports bounding of in the in-memory index cache > using maxBufferedDocs, which limits it to a fixed number of documents. When > document sizes vary substantially, especially when documents cannot be > truncated, this leads either to inefficiencies from a too-small value or > OutOfMemoryErrors from a too large value. > This simple patch exposes IndexWriter.flushRamSegments(), and provides access > to size information about IndexWriter.ramDirectory so that an application can > manage this based on total number of bytes consumed by the in-memory cache, > thereby allow a larger number of smaller documents or a smaller number of > larger documents. This can lead to much better performance while elimianting > the possibility of OutOfMemoryErrors. > The actual job of managing to a size constraint, or any other constraint, is > left up the applicatation. > The addition of synchronized to flushRamSegments() is only for safety of an > external call. It has no significant effect on internal calls since they all > come from a sychronized caller. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
