[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451763 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: ------------------------------------
wolfgang hoschek [21/Nov/06 10:22 AM] > Other question: when running the driver in test mode (checking for equality > of query > results against RAMDirectory) does InstantiatedIndex pass all tests? That > would be great! It sure does! xfiles = [./CHANGES.txt, ./LICENSE.txt] ########### iteration=0 *********** FILE=./CHANGES.txt diff=-0.020341659, query=term, scoreII=0.020341659, scoreRAM=0.020341659 diff=-0.024093388, query=term*, scoreII=0.024093388, scoreRAM=0.024093388 diff=-0.025180675, query=term~, scoreII=0.025180675, scoreRAM=0.025180675 diff=-0.018685007, query=Apache, scoreII=0.018685007, scoreRAM=0.018685007 diff=-0.014089426, query=Apach~ AND Copy*, scoreII=0.014089426, scoreRAM=0.014089426 *********** FILE=./LICENSE.txt diff=0.0, query=term, scoreII=0.0, scoreRAM=0.0 diff=-0.027122213, query=term*, scoreII=0.027122213, scoreRAM=0.027122213 diff=-0.028767452, query=term~, scoreII=0.028767452, scoreRAM=0.028767452 diff=-0.023488527, query=Apache, scoreII=0.023488527, scoreRAM=0.023488527 diff=-0.043373547, query=Apach~ AND Copy*, scoreII=0.043373547, scoreRAM=0.043373547 secs = 3.766 queries/sec= 2.655337 MB/sec = 0.083386995 No bug found. done. Process finished with exit code 0 > InstanciatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-550 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Store > Affects Versions: 1.9 > Reporter: Karl Wettin > Attachments: class_diagram.png, class_diagram.png, > instanciated_20060527.tar, InstanciatedIndexTermEnum.java, > lucene.1.9-karl1.jpg, lucene2-karl_20060722.tar.gz, > lucene2-karl_20060723.tar.gz > > > After fixing the bugs, it's now 4.5 -> 5 times the speed. This is true for > both at index and query time. Sorry if I got your hopes up too much. There > are still things to be done though. Might not have time to do anything with > this until next month, so here is the code if anyone wants a peek. > Not good enough for Jira yet, but if someone wants to fool around with it, > here it is. The implementation passes a TermEnum -> TermDocs -> Fields -> > TermVector comparation against the same data in a Directory. > When it comes to features, offsets don't exists and positions are stored ugly > and has bugs. > You might notice that norms are float[] and not byte[]. That is me who > refactored it to see if it would do any good. Bit shifting don't take many > ticks, so I might just revert that. > I belive the code is quite self explaining. > InstanciatedIndex ii = .. > ii.new InstanciatedIndexReader(); > ii.addDocument(s).. replace IndexWriter for now. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
