Eh, didn't make it.  JIRA?
Thanks,
Otis

----- Original Message ----
From: robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:51:14 PM
Subject: Re: Exposing IndexReader commit()

Attached is the current version of reopen().



On Dec 11, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

> Does anyone have any thoughts or feelings about this?
>
> There is also Robert Engels IndexReader.reopen():
>
>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.devel/9082/ 
> match=reopen
>
> (I couldn't find this in JIRA - is it sharable?)
>
> Thanks,
> Otis
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2006 5:35:20 PM
> Subject: Exposing IndexReader commit()
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering about opening up commit() in IndexReader.  It's  
> currently "protected".
>
> We'd like to be able to control the flushing of deletes to disk,  
> and it looks like that's what IndexReader's commit() does.  We  
> tried extending SegmentReader with our own version that overrides  
> commit() and let's us call it.  This worked for indices with a  
> single segment, because they are read by SegmentReader.  However,  
> this didn't work with multi-segment indices, because unlike  
> SegmentReader, MultiReader doesn't know how to dynamically load a  
> custom MultiReader.
> Both SegmentReader and MultiReader extend IndexReader, which  
> contains that protected commit().
>
> Next, we thought we'd try extending IndexReader and using our own  
> IndexReader, but since Segment|MultiReader extend IndexReader  
> directly, I don't think this approach would work.
>
> In the end, we just made commit() public in IndexReader, and solved  
> our problem for both single and multi-segment indices.
>
> Is there a better way to control flushing to disk without closing  
> and re-opening an IndexReader, which is more expensive than just  
> commit()ing.
> If not, what do you think about making commit() public and  
> javadocing it with "Expert:...."?
>
> Thanks,
> Otis
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to