[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=comments#action_12459731 ] Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-753: -------------------------------------
This patch continues to use BufferedIndexInput and allocates a new ByteBuffer for each call to read(). I wonder if it might be more efficient to instead directly extend IndexInput and always represent the buffer as a ByteBuffer? > Use NIO positional read to avoid synchronization in FSIndexInput > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-753 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Store > Reporter: Yonik Seeley > Attachments: FSIndexInput.patch > > > As suggested by Doug, we could use NIO pread to avoid synchronization on the > underlying file. > This could mitigate any MT performance drop caused by reducing the number of > files in the index format. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
