Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Le Mercredi 20 Décembre 2006 15:31, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
Hi Michael,

Have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-662

I am planning on starting on this soon (I know, I have been saying
that for a while, but I really am.)  At any rate, another set of eyes
would be good and I would be interested in hearing how your version
compares/works with this patch from Nicolas.

In fact the work I have done is more about the storing part of Lucene than the indexing part. But I think that the mechanism of defining in Java an "IndexFormat" I have introduced in my patch will be usefull in defining how the payload should be read and wrote.

About my patch, it needs to be synchronized with the current trunk. I will update it soon. It just need some clean up.

Nicolas


That's right, Nicolas' patch makes the Lucene *store* more flexible, whereas my payloads patch extends the *index* data structures.

Nicolas, I'm aware of your patch but haven't looked completely at it yet. I think it would be a great thing if our patches would work together. And with Dougs suggestions (see his response) we would be on the right track to the flexible indexing format! I would love to work together with you to achieve this goal. I will look at your patch more closely in the next days.

- Michael



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to