Hi Michael,
Can you explain in more detail on this bug why this makes you nervous?
Thanks,
Grant
On Jan 9, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
maxDoc should be explicitly stored in the index, not derived from
file length
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Key: LUCENE-767
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-767
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.9, 2.0.1, 2.1
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Assigned To: Michael McCandless
Priority: Minor
This is a spinoff of LUCENE-140
In general we should rely on "as little as possible" from the file
system. Right now, maxDoc is derived by checking the file length
of the FieldsReader index file (.fdx) which makes me nervous. I
think we should explicitly store it instead.
Note that there are no known cases where this is actually causing a
problem. There was some speculation in the discussion of LUCENE-140
that it could be one of the possible, but in digging / discussion
there were no specifically relevant JVM bugs found (yet!). So this
would be a defensive fix at this point.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
