On 1/12/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that readers are read-only, I think it makes sense to default the write lock into the index directory, and as you describe, no longer generate a "unique namespace" hash lock ID since the index dir gives us that scoping.
+1
Are there any reasons not to do this? I will open a JIRA issue to track this.
I don't think there are any implications for Solr's current replication scheme... I don't *think* that making a hard-link copy of the index directory (including the write-lock) is problematic, and distributing any write-lock to searchers should also be harmless. -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]