Mike,
Do you have any preference on making FieldInfo public versus moving
the FieldSelector stuff into the index package?
-Grant
On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 1/23/07, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-762?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#action_12466885 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-762:
----------------------------------------
This would also eliminate the need to change FieldsReader for
every new FieldSelectorResult that we want. The downside is that
it would most likely involve some reworking of
FieldSelectorResult. This probably isn't a big deal, since the
FieldSelector stuff hasn't been released yet and has been noted to
be experimental, but it has been on trunk for a while, so it is in
use, I'm sure. I think Solr has incorporated it, but I am not sure.
Yes, we have incorporated it and it is in release 1.1. However, it
is a backend optimization that isn't exposed to the user (except
perhaps some doing fancy things with custom RequestHandlers), so it
isn't too much trouble to modify.
-Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
