Yonik Seeley wrote:
As long as you wouldn't object to a org.apache.lucene package in Solr... With the understanding of course, that the onus would be on Solr developers to keep up with any changes.
I wouldn't object to that. Would you? Solr's developers are pretty on-top of Lucene and should thus be better able to track things than most. I think that's preferable to introducing a new public API with the expectation of deprecating it soon. It's not an ideal solution. Does anyone have a better proposal?
Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
