These articles are over 3 years old or more, I think the large
community that uses Maven says it is a worthwhile thing. I'm
curious, Slava, how many of ViewTier's Parabuild clients use Maven,
since your website says you support it?
I'm not saying Maven is the be all end all, but it works pretty well
IMO. Having said that, we have most everything we need in the ANT
scripts we already have, except, maybe automated releases and nice
project metadata like the POM provides, so I'm not that compelled to
switch. In light of our prior discussions of having more frequent
releases, I think having more automated releases is needed.
-Grant
On Feb 15, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Slava Imeshev wrote:
Here is a couple of alternative points of view on Maven. Make
sure your kids are not reading this:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=why_maven_sucks
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=maven_refresher_course
----- Original Message -----
From: "karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <java-dev@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Maven builds
15 feb 2007 kl. 23.03 skrev Steven Rowe:
I'll see what I can do this weekend.
"Maven" refers to two very different products. Which version to use
ought to be a serious consideration.
Karl, do you mean to use Maven 1.X or Maven2?
Maven2. mvn.
--
karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
