+1. (also since releases are going to be more frequent.)
Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/02/2007 08:49:33: > +1. Out the door is good, esp. since there haven't been complaints > about it in the past. > > Thanks for doing this Yonik! > > > On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > Recap: > > - some contrib modules can't be built without the user downloading > > more jars themselves > > - the "demo" in the binary package currently needs to be built by the > > user, and needs a special build.xml that doesn't rely on lucene source > > code (oops). I just verified that this was also broken in the 2.0.0 > > release. > > > > My opinion: > > - things aren't worse than in past releases > > - people can always use the binary release to get pre-built jars > > - people can always get the source for any version out of our > > subversion repository > > - most people's use of the source jar is not to build Lucene, but to > > study the source and/or point their IDE at it. > > - not all contrib modules are equal... some like highlighting and > > stemmers are often used, while others like gdata shouldn't even be > > rev'd at the same time as lucene. > > > > So, given that these aren't code quality issues, I think the biggest > > benefit to users would be to get this out the door as is, and work on > > the output of "ant dist src-dist" going forward to tighten things up. > > > > -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
