All wiki changes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: commited docs vs wiki -- was: Re: [jira] Commented:
(LUCENE-805) New Lucene Demo
I'll ask on infrastructure if there is a way to take a snapshot of
the Wiki as HTML for release purposes. If we can do that, then I
think we could move more to the Wiki. One solution, would be to have
a simple script that calls wget (or some crawler) and downloads all
of the wiki. It would, however, be better if the wiki supported
tagging a snapshot. I've seen flashes of references on other
projects about the Confluence wiki from Atlassian. Is this available
for use at Apache and does it have the features we want?
Also, FWIW, I just updated the release page on the Wiki and it said:
---
Thank you for your changes. Your attention to detail is
appreciated.
Status of sending notification mails:
[en] DanielNaber, StevenParkes, : Mail sent OK
---
Do these two really receive all the wiki change notification emails
or are they just subscribed to this particular page?
-Grant
On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : Yeah, query-syntax is pretty static, so that would be fine, but I
> : sense a slippery slope here. Scoring is static, too, but I think if
> : people want to add to the scoring doc, that would be fine. Part of
> : me feels like it should be all the docs, including the file
> formats b/
> : c we are trying to encourage people to document. On the other hand,
> : some parts of the docs, like the file formats and query-syntax, feel
> : more in stone to me and I can see a case that they should only be
> : changed through a patch approach so that a committer is reviewing
> the
>
> i'm with you all the way on that one ... it seems like every day i
> change
> my mind about how important it is to have "official" documentation
> vs wiki
> documentation.
>
> when solr first entered incubation, most of our stuff went in the wiki
> just because it seemed like the easiest way to get feedback,
> improvements, and copy-editing from the widest audience ... we
> discussed
> migrating docs into subversion once they were more fleshed out, but
> now
> we're looking at migrating more docs from subversion to the wiki
> then we
> are the other direction.
>
> for Lucene-Java i'd be really leary of things like fileformats,
> querystynax, and scoring just being wiki pages ... people still ask
> questions about the fileformat from lucene 1.4.2, or how scoring
> worked in
> 1.2 ... if the only history of thta info was in a wiki where you
> had to
> figure out the right historic version that lined up with your code
> based
> on date stamps of commits (because we'd want to update the doc when
> hte
> change was commited, not when the release was made)
>
> the killer solution to a lot of problems would be a good utility for
> slurping the whole wiki into html files, with all of hte wiki links
> *and*
> all of the links from the wiki to the "site" being translated into
> relative file paths as an automated part of hte release.
>
> the only other anoyance i have about the wiki that wouldn't be
> solved with
> something like thta is the "javadoc annotation missing feature"
> problem of
> the wiki ... some things really belong in javadocs, but you still
> want to
> allow users to easily annoate those docs with their own tips/tricks
> about
> using it ... stuff that's deliniated as not being formal
> documentation,
> but still good to keep in mind, ie:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
>
> PHP.net set the gold standard for this years ago...
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php
>
> ...and Perl's CPAN is making progress...
> http://www.annocpan.org/~AREIBENS/PDF-API2-0.57/lib/PDF/
> API2.pm#note_1389
>
> ... but i've never seen a good Javadoc appraoch to this problem,
> and none
> of these solutions really address the issue of "releasing" baked
> versions
> of hte documentation that include the annotations/tips ... you'd
> have to
> commit them as part of the formal docs)
>
> : wiki policy to notify java-dev or java-commits when there are
> : changes? I'm not sure how the wiki is administered or if I'm
> missing
> : the notifications already.
>
> i believe wiki edits already go to the commits list (that's how we set
> Solr up anyway)
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
