[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489540
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-834:
----------------------------------------
Would it be so bad if memory consumption was proportional to posting list size?
True, special consideration might be necessary for large documents if payloads
were large, and if you have any Query subclasses that rewrite themselves to a
zillion subqueries, each of which maintains its own TermPositions subclass
instance, that could pose difficulties. What are some other problematic
scenarios?
> Payload Queries
> ---------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assigned To: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: boosting.term.query.patch
>
>
> Now that payloads have been implemented, it will be good to make them
> searchable via one or more Query mechanisms. See
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Payload_Planning for some background
> information and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755 for the
> issue that started it all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
