Regarding LUCENE-446 (function queries): Michael Busch wrote on 01/06/2007 23:31:11:
> > This is new API, so I was kinda waiting for some feedback on it. > > Another passible issue is that it expands FieldCache and > > FieldcacheImpl - while LUCENE-831 "Complete overhaul of > > FieldCache API/Implementation" is also changing it. > > So I think this can wait for the next release. > With 9 votes this is the most popular issue in Jira. I > understand your concerns about the API. Maybe we should > commit this with comments in the javadocs saying > that this feature is in beta state and that the APIs > might still be subject to change? I am okay with this - stating that the API is not final yet works well here since o.a.l.search.function is an entirely new package. The part I am not sure of in this regard are my changes to FieldCache and FieldcacheImpl, while LUCENE-831 is ongoing too. (though btw 831 doesn't apply cleanly on current trunk). (It is my plan to get into LUCENE-831 but I haven't got to it yet.) I will clean it a bit and go on with committing this unless there are objections. Doron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
