[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501237
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-622:
----------------------------------------
How does Karl's patch compare to Sami's? I haven't looked in-depth at either
yet. I will try to at some point. Karl seems to be saying it has poms for each
of the contribs, etc. which is probably easier to maintain. This whole bolting
on of Maven to ANT just seems a little weird to me.
FYI, Hoss, the way to validate the POM is by using Maven! :-) It does it for
you.
I am beginning to think we should try having a parallel build for a little bit
in order for people to test out the different approaches. I think the
committers doing releases will see the biggest win from Maven, but I am not
100% sure. If Karl's patch achieves this, then I think we could use it as the
basis for doing the evaluation.
> Provide More of Lucene For Maven
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-622
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Stephen Duncan Jr
> Assignee: Michael Busch
> Fix For: 2.2
>
> Attachments: lucene-622.txt, lucene-core.pom,
> lucene-highlighter-2.0.0.pom, lucene-maven.patch, lucene-maven.tar.bz2
>
>
> Please provide javadoc & source jars for lucene-core. Also, please provide
> the rest of lucene (the jars inside of "contrib" in the download bundle) if
> possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
