[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502156
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-908:
--------------------------------------
As always these are very good recommendations Hoss! I think I will commit my
patch for 2.2, because it works fine. But I will leave this issue open (just
clear the Fix version) to keep in mind that we want to make these improvements.
> MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations)
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Michael Busch
> Assignee: Michael Busch
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.2
>
> Attachments: lucene-908.patch, LUCENE-908.patch
>
>
> there are several problems with the MANIFEST.MF file used in the core jar,
> and some inconsistencies in th luci jar:
> Lucli's build.xml has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target
> from common-build.xml. The result
> is that the MANIFEST.MF file is not consistent and the META-INF dir does not
> contain LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.
> Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think
> we should fix this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
