Hi,
i removed that field.but cant able to compress 20% of the original
size.when i index some fields it took almost 2:10 of the size.how can i
compress please help me in this regards.
hossman_lucene wrote:
>
>
> First off: please don't send questions about *using* the Lucene Java
> library to the java-dev list ... it is for discussion about *developing*
> the internals of hte Lucene Java API. the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is for
> discussion about *using* the API in your own applications.
>
> If you hav any followup questions, please start a new thread on that list.
>
> : * document.add(new Field("contents",contents,
> : Field.Store.YES,Field.Index.TOKENIZED));
>
> I'm going to guess that you don't really need to "store" that field since
> it seems to be a meaningless concatenation of a bunch of data that you've
> already stored in other fields. Field.Store.NO will probably cut down
> your index size by a significant ammount.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Compression-tf3878281.html#a11188311
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
