On Jun 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Looking at the diffs for docs/index.html it seems like the site has
gone
back and forth between 0.7 and 0.8 the past week or so depending on
who is
updating it (gsingers is using 0.7 and buschmi is using 0.8) and
not all
of the files on the trunk are actually consistent ... some were
generated
with 0.7 and some with 0.8. Which raises some questions:
1) Is it safe to say we should pick a version and stick with it, and
update all docs at the same time so we don't have a mix of versions
and a
lot of commits consisting just of template changes like these...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/docs/demo.html?
r1=548640&r2=548896
2) do we still want to use 0.7? If so, does anyone understand the
forrest
plugin mechanism well enough to explain how to ensure you get the
"good"
version of the pdf plugin (ie: whichever one doesn't barf on our
xdocs)
3) do we want to start using 0.8? If so, then question for
Michael: how
did you manage to get 0.8 to work for you with sitemap.xmap file we
have
committed? when I just flat out deleted my local copy of it,
forrest 0.8
seemed to work fine -- but it's hard to be sure there were no bad side
effects since the svn diff is so big (with many files going from
0.7 to
0.8)
I think it makes sense to move to 0.8.
-Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
