This is good stuff... Might be good to put a organized version of
this up on the Wiki under Best Practices
On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Yeah it's not so easy now: Field.java does not have setters.
You have to make your own class that implements Fieldable (or
subclasses AbstractField) and adds your own setters. Field.java is
also [currently] final so you can't subclass it.
Should we consider putting in these changes? I think it might be a
little weird on the Search side to have setters for Field and it
sounds like it could cause trouble for people esp. in a threaded
indexing situation, but maybe I am mistaken?
At any rate, it sounds like these would be good contributions as long
as they are well documented.
-Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
