Slowly catching up... Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I think legally we are fine, since we aren't actually shipping it. I > just mean that people may not want to wait however long it takes to > download it. Of course, I don't know a work around other than to > have some smaller set. Measured the times - conrib/benchmark test now takes 4 minutes on first run (with Reuters downloading) and 2 minutes in following runs. I think this is not too bad (?) Btw, The 2 mins includes the parallel test that indexes entire Reuters collection. Once TestQualityRun is committed, it would also index that entire collection, but I changed the parallel test to index only a few documents (so it would not add 2 more minutes). > On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: > > > Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2007 05:20:34: > > > >> Does this imply it is going to download the test collection for > >> people when they don't have it when running tests? I don't know if > >> that is something people are going to want to happen. > > > > Yes it does.. and so would auto-build-bots - I am also using > > the Reuters collection for TestQualityRun in LUCENE-836. Do > > you mean legal wise? I should probably add a "DOWNLOAD" > > warning here. Is there another issue with this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
