Right, I thought briefly about that one, but in the end wasn't sure
how to handle it. Having the SpanFilterResult change is no big deal,
btw, at least not until it is officially released. I would be fine
w/ putting a note saying this is experimental and subject to change.
On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Paul Elschot (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-968?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#action_12516429 ]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-968:
-------------------------------------
Ok, I missed that possible use as a Filter. I'm busy with
LUCENE-584, and I could not figure out how to deal with this one.
Since it is a Filter, I'll include it in there as one of the
currently present Filters.
SpanFilter should not extend Filter
-----------------------------------
Key: LUCENE-968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-968
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 2.3
Reporter: Paul Elschot
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 2.3
Attachments: SpanFilter20070729.patch
All tests pass with the patch applied.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
