[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll closed LUCENE-999.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
Lucene Fields: (was: [New])
yeah, sorry for the noise. Don't know what I was thinking. I thought it would
help with http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/52904 but I am
now guessing this person is using an older version of Lucene
> Searcher class should have an abstract declaration of doc(int n,
> FieldSelector)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-999
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Add:
> abstract public Document doc(int n, FieldSelector fieldSelector) throws
> CorruptIndexException, IOException;
> to Searcher, since it is defined by Searchable anyway, which Searcher
> implements. This would allows people using Searcher to have access to the
> FieldSelector mechanism.
> If there are no objections, I will commit this change by Monday, as I don't
> think it will break anything, because all derived classes already have to
> implement it anyway.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
