Are you proposing to donate a license to Lucene (ASF) so we can host
it here as long as we choose or do you want to continue to host it as
you already do? The main reason, in my opinion, we use Hudson is b/
c we have control over it, we have someone within the committership
willing to maintain it (Nigel and me), and we have multiple projects
using it, for better or worse.
But I am also open to other suggestions. I think other ASF projects
are using Bamboo. And, as always, there is the old nightly.sh we
could revert to.
-Grant
On Sep 20, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Slava Imeshev wrote:
Guys,
I just wanted to point out that Parabuild has been building Lucene
happily for quite some time
without any problems, with binaries, statistics and everything:
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?
displaygroupid=5
Is there anything that prevent you from considering Parabuild as a
permanent solution?
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
--- Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1002 covers these
two issues to the extent that they are breaking the nightly builds.
-Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
