: Anyone know what the procedure/licensing implications are if I wanted to add a : build dependency on DTDDoc? It looks like historically the Struts project used : DTDDoc for some of their documentation but that was using Maven 2 and it looks : to me like DTDDoc is not entirely Apache licensed see: : http://dtddoc.sourceforge.net/license.txt
even if we can't included DTDDoc in the code base/release, this seems like a similar issue to that of JFlex when standardAnalyzer was changed ... it's just a tool for generating HTML docs from the DTD right? so the build system could assume a developer has DTDDoc installed if they attempt to run "ant dtd-docs" and fail otherwise. the generated HTML docs could be commited to the repository (just like hte generated StandardTokenizer.java is commited to the repository) so casual developers don't *have* to have DTDDoc installed to read the documentation. right? -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
