Doug Cutting wrote: > > If this is really required, perhaps it ought to appear as an attribute > for stored fields, indicating that the field should be stored in a > separate "column store". This would permit efficient enumeration of > values of just that field. >
Yes I was thinking about this too. I'm just not sure if this is confusing for the users, because it will be conceptually different how to retrieve "normal" stored fields vs. "column-stored" fields. The former via getDocument() (multiple field values at a time), but the latter via an Iterator similar to TermDocs (one value at a time). Do you think this would be confusing? Or do you have other ideas for the retrieval API? -Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
