[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539600
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-743:
-------------------------------------------

{quote}
This is complex enough that in addition to review, I think we need a
good multi-threaded test - 100 or 1000 threads over a ram directory,
all changing, querying, retrieving docs, reopening, closing, etc.
{quote}

+1

We should fix all the synchronization issues you've found, create this
unit test, and then iterate from there.


> IndexReader.reopen()
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>         Attachments: IndexReaderUtils.java, lucene-743-take2.patch, 
> lucene-743-take3.patch, lucene-743-take4.patch, lucene-743-take5.patch, 
> lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, MyMultiReader.java, 
> MySegmentReader.java, varient-no-isCloneSupported.BROKEN.patch
>
>
> This is Robert Engels' implementation of IndexReader.reopen() functionality, 
> as a set of 3 new classes (this was easier for him to implement, but should 
> probably be folded into the core, if this looks good).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to